(VIDEO) – Networks somehow can’t find the time, so Fox News does their job for them

I’m glad that we only have to (God willing) put up with this guy in the White House for a little while longer, ’cause I don’t think I could handle another four years.

More and more, our Media sounds like a thousand cats-in-heat on your back porch: high-pitched, annoying and more than a little unsettling. They are systematically steamrolling any negative news for President Precious, while they continue to push that day’s narrative regardless of how provably false it may be.

Over the weekend, the best example of this came from George Stephanopoulos on his ABC Sunday show, as he asked this question during a discussion on Benghazi:

“Hasn’t the White House been relatively transparent?”

I saw that quote and thought, “Naaahh… can’t be”. So, I looked it up: the transcript is HERE.

He was serious. Stephanopoulos was defending Obama’s complete two-week sock-puppet show on Benghazi and the video by saying…that the Administration had been “relatively transparent”. George wasn’t just asking it rhetorically; he wasn’t trying to play Devil’s Advocate to make a point.

I repeat: He. Was. Serious.

Given all of the facts which have already come to light on Benghazi, I find that question stunning. Are we to believe that he has simply taken the White House’s newest claims, which fly directly in the face of ALL the facts, and decided,  “yeah, that sounds about right”?

I’ve seen more intellectual curiosity from my neighbor’s Yorkshire Terrier.

This is why I find it so laughable that Fox News is reviled by the Left for the high crime & misdemeanor of not being another outpost of DNC “Newspeak”. It’s like controlling almost the entire Monopoly board, and being miffed that you can’t get your mitts on Baltic Avenue, too.

Speaking of Newspeak, I was flipping through my copy of ‘1984‘ the other day, and I read a term which I’d forgotten. See if this parallels Mr. Stephanopoulos’s example above:

blackwhite– The ability to accept whatever “truth” the party puts out, no matter how absurd it may be. Orwell described it as “…loyal willingness to say black is white when party discipline demands this. It also means the ability to believe that black is white, and more, to know black is white, and forget that one has ever believed the contrary.”

I’d say that’s fairly accurate.

So, in the interest of further infuriating the Fox News haters, please allow me to share with you a special that was on over the weekend, hosted by Fox’s Bret Baier. It covers the entire Benghazi travesty and eventual charade, with tons of back-story details, most of which I’d not heard or seen yet.

It is troubling; it’s frightening; …and it’s the truth.

(**Thanks to AceOfSpadesHQ for the heads-up on this**)


The entire show is 41 minutes, but at least watch the first 10. You haven’t seen any of this anywhere else, I assure you.

Final question: if lil’ old Fox News can find this info, and do such a thorough job providing context, history, and multitudinous facts surrounding a terrorist attack which cost us 4 American lives and has emboldened our enemies, …why haven’t the bigger, better funded, network news organizations been able to do so?

Of course, you already know the answer to that one.

10 responses to “(VIDEO) – Networks somehow can’t find the time, so Fox News does their job for them

  1. LivinRightinPGH

    Transparent?? SUPERMAN’S x-ray vision might not be sufficient.
    Anyone remember: “All pending legislation will be posted on the internet AT LEAST THREE DAYS before a vote.” ????

    • Oh, THAT?
      Yeah, that was out the window almost immediately. Hey, Barack didn’t want you to have to suffer through watching how the sausage is made.
      He was thinking of you.

      Geez, …”you’d THINK(you’d) be grateful”!
      …..which was another of my favorite lines of his, by the way…

  2. It simply blows my mind that almost half of the US believes what they see on network news and what comes out of O’s mouth.
    On Meet the Press yesterday, Joe Klein, NYT, said: “This business about the, you know, the Libya consulate has been like the October mirage – it really isn’t an issue.”
    *So, the death of our ambassador and 3 others has little meaning?*
    I need to go back and reread 1984.

    • Spoke w/ GBL about that very thought this morning, tannngl. It is beyond prescient by now: that book is downright creepy.

      When I first read it, years ago, I had no idea it would be followed like a “How-To” pamphlet by the Left….

  3. Reblogged this on That Mr. G Guy's Blog and commented:
    Never ceases to amaze me the MSM’s undying loyalty to the Democratic party.

    • Thanks, Mr G!! Just when I think these Media goofballs can’t possibly be any more submerged into the Kool-aid then they already are, …they prove me wrong.

      Calling this crew journalists is an insult to Lefty journalists of the past. Heck, at least those guys STUMBLED over the truth once in a while…

  4. You didn’t hear it
    You didn’t see it
    You never heard it not a word of it.
    You won’t say nothing to no one
    Never tell a soul
    What you know is the Truth. ( From “Tommy” by The Who)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s