#Obamacare: “Law Of The Land”, or Presidential Whimsy?

Alarm 575

We’ve all experienced it: the shrieking alarm that for whatever reason won’t/can’t be silenced. When faced with a noise (or a smell, or any other negative stimulus) which continues unabated, eventually over time it can become so commonplace, so constant, that we no longer pay it any notice.

Practically speaking, it ceases to exist.

The psychological term for this is “desensitization“. Unfortunately, it perfectly describes the Obama era and the White House’s repeated, extra-Constitutional delays of the politically problematic aspects of Obamacare. They’ve now happened so many times that they are barely even news.

Just like the shrieking alarm that we no longer hear, we filter them out. They no longer exist.

The most recent example occurred Monday:

(via the Wall Street Journal) – ‘ObamaCare” is useful shorthand for the Affordable Care Act, not least because the law increasingly means whatever President Obama says it does on any given day. His latest lawless rewrite arrived on Monday as the White House decided to delay the law’s employer mandate for another year and in some cases maybe forever.

Under the new Treasury rule, firms with 50-to-99 full-time workers are free from the mandate until 2016. And firms with 100 or more workers now also only need cover 70% of full-time workers in 2015 and 95% in 2016 and after, not the 100% specified in the law.

The new rule also relaxes the mandate for certain occupations and industries that were at particular risk for disruption, like volunteer firefighters, teachers, adjunct faculty members and seasonal employees. Oh, and the Treasury also notes that, “As these limited transition rules take effect, we will consider whether it is necessary to further extend any of them beyond 2015.”

So, the law may be suspended indefinitely if the White House feels like it.

To hear the Democrats tell it, this is completely normal, there’s nothing to see here, yada, yada, yada… Which I’ll kindly request that you to keep in mind the first time a Republican president tries this someday down the road. Rest assured, the terms “lawless” or “imperial presidency” WILL be rolled out, accompanied by copious amounts of outrage.

Ron Fournier and the brilliant Dr. Krauthammer clashed over this last night, although Ron didn’t offer his normal level of pro-Obama exuberance:

And while I agree with Charles’ opinion in full, any self-respecting Banana Republic should bristle at being compared to this White House right about now.

Additionally, it is not insignificant that even folks like Fournier, long an enthusiastic Obamacare proponent, is finally showing signs of fatigue from having to continually defend Obama’s machinations and delays, and who can blame him? When even CNN is admitting that this move is purely and nakedly political, no one outside of the MSNBC greenroom is likely to try to spin it otherwise.

Wait a sec. Did I say “no one outside of MSNBC…“?

My bad:

And speaking of “Screams of Politics”, we now have THIS newest aspect of the law.

(via HotAir.com) – Treasury officials said Monday that businesses will be told to “certify” that they are not shedding full-time workers simply to avoid the mandate. Officials said employers will be told to sign a “self-attestation” on their tax forms affirming this, under penalty of perjury.

As Ed said later in the same post: “…They’ve certainly gotten the “bully” part of the bully pulpit in mind these days at the White House…”

Stop bullying 4746

Now, the question is simple: will we comply with this most ephemeral of laws, now essentially a product of daily Presidential whimsy? Or will we refuse, and demand that our elected leaders adhere to their sworn oaths to uphold our Constitution?

Desensitization only occurs until a third-party “breaks the spell”, and points out what heretofore your brain had been ignoring. Faced with an utterly lawless Executive Branch, we cannot allow ourselves to become desensitized this way. We must make ourselves hear the alarms going off, and then must respond in kind.

Or, to quote one of my favorite lines from The Gipper many years ago now, when our country was faced with another lawless regime:

“…He counted on America to be passive. He counted wrong.”

-(Ronald Reagan, April 14, 1986)

10 responses to “#Obamacare: “Law Of The Land”, or Presidential Whimsy?

  1. Charles Krauthammer was spot on about this how a banana republic would act. Of course we all remember that Oblunder was going to fundamentally transform America, transforming into a laughing stock. With many of the republicans with no spine, no will or principle and you mix that with the sheep following the president blindly.

    We are falling into the rabbit hole with cement shoes on, I’m beginning to lose faith this can even be saved without a miracle.

  2. I think you’ve hit the nail on the head…..again. The more we hear the same thing we become desensitized to it. And you can’t tell me that’s coincidence. It’s all part of the agenda. We have become conditioned much like you can condition an animal to just assume the chain holding him down is actually attached to something. Well…..the alarm is still going off in my head and obviously still in yours. Our job is to project that alarm to the American public.

  3. I love David Burge’s Tweet! Definitely my sentiment right now, and apparently that of millions of others, if Scott Rasmussen is to be believed. Read his editorial on civil disobedience: http://www.rasmussenmediagroup.com/column/civil-disobedience-may-cure-healthcaregov

  4. If I’m not mistaken, we’ve now seen the POTUS modify a law, unconstitutionally …over 25 times? Remember when we had to be in such a hurry to pass the PPACA? 3 Years later, it’s even more of a mess.

    My question is this: Where, oh WHERE, are the Republicans in this?
    Seems as if the strategy is to not point anything out and just “rely” on the American people to see through all of these shenanigans in time for the mid-term elections. Well…excuse ME if I don’t trust this same group of Americans whom the MSM duped into voting for this lame excuse of a President…..TWICE!!!

    We’ve degenerated to a point where far too many just simply don’t care about Constitutional, or Un-Constitutional. All they care about is “Am I gettin’ mine?”

  5. This is promotion of this sick agenda, if u say it enough it becomes reality. He can’t do any more than the ppl ALLOW, AND THEY R ALLOWING. I am sick of these PURPLE wearing demons, pretending they r against it, when the damn PURPLE gives them away.

    A bunch of PLANNED ****, they pretend to be at AWE… but all the while putting these insane notions, that shouldn’t even be a thought let alone a topic of CONVERSATION. Purple wearing maniacs!. Thanks for posting, comment not at blogger.

    • Forgive an old man who’s not that educated, but would you be so kind, Sherayx, as to translate your comment so that I can understand what you’re trying to say?
      1. Are you for or against the President breaking the very law he passed?
      2. Who and what are the purple wearing demons?

      Thank you for helping an old man to understand….

    • Well…..lacking any feedback from Sherayx, I did a little digging and found that “Purple Demon” is one of many street names for LSD. Not really sure how that fits into the conversation, but I wasn’t going to go through all of that trouble to find it, and NOT share the info.

      Sheray! WHERE ARE YOU???!!!

  6. Love your comment GBL, I agree wholeheartedly.

  7. Pingback: Yet another “adjustment” to Obama’s Glorious-yet-Ever-Changing Healthcare Plan | Two Heads are Better Than One

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s