**With apologies to Captain Renault….
Are we really supposed to believe that Obama is dismayed and distraught at revelations of political intimidation within the IRS? That (according to Allahpundit) he “just found out about this on Friday”?
Is our President honestly expecting us to swallow the following tale: that for some inexplicable reason, a rogue band of low-level IRS flunkies took it upon themselves to target the political enemies of this Administration, all without Obama’s imprimatur?
Based on his rhetoric today, why yes, that’s exactly what we’re supposed to believe. Courtesy of Talking Points Memo:
“If in fact IRS personnel engaged in the kind of practices that have been reported on, and were intentionally targeting conservative groups, then that’s outrageous,” Obama said during a joint press conference with Britain’s Prime Minister David Cameron.
“And there’s no place for it. And they have to be held fully accountable. Because the IRS as an independent agency, requires absolute integrity and people have to have confidence that they’re applying it in a nonpartisan way.
I’m thinking that any chance at that has just been blown to smithereens.
Yep, the man whose flunkies have openly tried to marginalize those who he felt were his political enemies, ever since he’s been in office, now expects us to buy his incredulity in this case? And all while coming on the heels of the newest findings in the Benghazi hearings?
Feel free to mark me down as “skeptical”.
We’ve documented Obama’s team as being generally clueless, time and time again, whenever something unsavory is found to have happened. The IRS scandal is yet another troubling example in a long pedigree of illicit actions against their critics. The now almost trite question, “What if Bush had done “x”?“, doesn’t even need to be asked anymore: the airwaves would be so thick with self-righteous Liberal outrage, they’d block out the sun.
Courtesy of the Free Beacon, here’s Newt Gingrich’s take on all this (appearing on MSNBC, no less!), which echos the question which we asked on Saturday:
“Look, he has a huge problem because Obamacare relies very heavily on the IRS. Now every American understands there are elements of the IRS that go off on their own, do what they want to. The effort now (of course) is to say it was “low-level employees”.
Yet, those “low-level employees” apparently saw public reports that they weren’t doing what they were doing and nobody informed anyone in the IRS, let alone the Treasury.”
“How can you put Obamacare under the Internal Revenue Service? Remember, this is the administration which will not profile terrorists but profile patriots? Profile Constitutional groups?
I mean, this is almost madness.”
“Almost”? No, Newt, this IS madness.
The President does indeed have a huge problem here, and it boils down to “trust“. If you do not trust the person in charge, it becomes impossible for that person to lead effectively. Faced with such resistance, what does he/she then do to enact their goals?
Logically, that leader really only has three options:
- (A) try to win back some degree of trust with honest investigations into the root cause of the initial problems,
- (B) resign himself to diminished influence until his leadership ends, or (and most disturbingly):
- (C) attempt to implement his goals through sheer force, subterfuge, or both.
That third option is the one I fear most, and thus far, I’ve seen nothing to dissuade me from thinking that is Obama’s preferred choice, now & always.
Of course, such a thought likely already has me on a “special” list at the IRS:
Wow! As USUAL, you get my blood boiling! (My doctor will be calling you soon!) With all that I COULD write, let me whittle it down to your three options:
1. There’s not enough DECADES or CENTURIES of time wherein Obama could win back trust from me. Only the most dedicated Kool-Aid drinkers of his could shrug it off.
2. He’s WAY too much of a narcissist.
3. You mean JUST LIKE most things he’s done?
He makes “recess appointments” when there’s no recess. He pushes laws clearly NOT wanted by the majority of Americans. He appoints czars and issues Executive Orders OUTSIDE of the legislative process and in avoidance of the same. He IS the most UN-constitutional POTUS of all time.
Agreed, on all counts, Pgh. Option #3 is really the only avenue left open to him now. His popularity won’t suddenly rise, barring some unforeseen miracle. And I’d be even more suspicious of such an event necessary for that to happen.
I’m not a conspiracy theorist, at all, but the crushing weight of scandal which is present in this Administration is beginning to make me believe these folks are capable of almost anything.
I probably have a “star” next to MY name in the IRS database…
Which is probably WHY they’re trying so hard to take away our 2nd Amendment rights.
Safety concerns? I don’t think so, but it sure is EMOTIONALLY appealing.
A “less capable resistance”? If you’re pursuing the last option you listed, it SURE would make it a “tad” easier, eh?
As you’re aware, I hate having to think the worst of people.
But at this point, Obama isn’t leaving me much of a choice….
Awwww, don’t be so hard on yourself, brother. He makes it EASY to feel that way.
I know one thing: it’s a darn good thing I’m not inclined to drink heavily when angered or depressed.
Otherwise, I’d have been on a permanent bender for the past 4+ years…
Th thought for sure he was going to say he was going to enter into some form of conflict with Syria. He has to start a war with someone for the distraction. Of course there is the option as inferred above.
You’re right, BV: a war or other super-sized distraction could (repeat: could) take the heat off of him, but even then it’s not a guarantee, and more importantly: he largely doesn’t control it.
If we get attacked, maybe. If he attacks? Probably not. And if there’s even a sniff of a false-flag type event?
Even he wouldn’t be able to sustain that.
Pingback: OUT: “Hope ‘n Change” – IN: “Oh, What a Tangled Web We Weave, ….” | Two Heads are Better Than One
Pingback: Once upon a time, Gov’t worked to DESTROY the Mafia. Now, they ARE the Mafia… | Two Heads are Better Than One
Pingback: The Economics of “Confidence” | Two Heads are Better Than One
Pingback: In the new War On Terror, WE are now the targets | Two Heads are Better Than One
Pingback: FLASHBACK: it’s “Wrongheaded” and “Cynical” to mistrust your Government… | Two Heads are Better Than One