Being “Discriminating” when it comes to #Immigration would be a GOOD thing….

Had a discussion with a young man the other day about why “discrimination” was not inherently a bad thing.

Now, that sentence will make some people immediately go “Whaaaat??”, but before they rush to burn me at the stake, kindly recall what “to discriminate” meant originally. Coming from the Latin discriminatus (which is the past participle of discriminare), the word literally means “to distinguish between”, and dates back to the 1620’s. Even its secondary definition is “to use good judgement”.

So, whenever we have to decide between one option or the other (soup or a sandwich? Coke or Pepsi? Ginger or Mary Ann?), we’re being “discriminating”…, as well as eminently logical.

Ginger or MAry Ann

…when I was 13, Gilligan WAS my hero…

Naturally, the Left has taken this word and slapped a new meaning onto it, making it in essence a pejorative. This has long been a favorite tactic of Liberals, who’ve also redefined or tortured words such as fairgay, hatejudgmentalrich, racist …and even liberal itself. The result being that “discrimination” now almost solely refers to ILLEGAL discrimination, although the “illegal” part is virtually never included in its use. 

And so I told the young man (whom I originally mentioned), being truly “discriminatory” has historically been and remains a good thing, and we’d undoubtedly be much better off if we were to be more discriminatory, not less. 

Consider the horror of the 2013 Boston Bombing. From the Washington Free Beacon:

“…The FBI revealed last week that it was warned by a foreign government in 2011 that Tamerlan Tsarnaev, who was killed Friday, was tied to “radical Islam” but the FBI was unable to confirm the links.

“The fact is religion has been expunged from counter-terrorism training,” said Sebastian Gorka, a counter-terrorism specialist with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. “The FBI can’t talk about Islam and they can’t talk about jihad.”

Fbi_logo

Added Patrick S. Poole, another counter-terrorism specialist, about FBI policies on Islam: “I have zero doubt it affected their investigation of Tsarnaev.”

A U.S. official said FBI policies of playing down Islamic links to terrorism resulted in the FBI not identifying Tsarnaev, 26, or his brother, Dzhokar Tsarnaev, 19, who was charged with last week’s bombing, as Islamist terrorists.

It was the failure of the FBI to properly discriminate which allowed these terrorists to remain free. Why? Because to “discriminate” has become such a loaded word that even the appropriate application of it is now taboo, and now even our law enforcement is so terrified of being charged with illegal discrimination lawsuits, protests and bad PR that they refuse to acknowledge clues which are right. In front. Of their eyes.

And this applies to our immigration policy in toto. We have roughly 314 million citizens here in the United States, and by rights we should WANT to discriminate as to who is allowed to join those already here, for both our physical and economic safety.

A sovereign nation is NOT a public pool, open to whomever happens to wander in first.

By neglecting to properly differentiate between people who’d be a net positive for our country and those who wouldn’t, our failure to discriminate is quite literally killing us.

immigration

At this rate, the United States of America will no longer be a beacon of liberty to the world, or a shining city on a hill. We’ll still be a beacon, though: to every potential welfare-sucking leech who manages to summon the requisite energy necessary to flop their lazy carcass over our border and yell, “Feed me”.

If we weren’t so all-fired scared of potentially discriminating against anyone for any reason, such lunacy wouldn’t even be brought up for debate.

Our nation is in trouble, and although Obama has hastened and encouraged much of it, he’s not the original source: we are. Not until enough of us become so repulsed by such events that we demand action will our duly elected representatives have any reason to alter their behavior. Only if we begin to use good judgement as we once did, regularly, will our politicians respond in kind.  

Hmmm…, it’s just that “use good judgement” sounds sorta’, well, …boring and long-winded, doesn’t it?

Darn it: if only we had a better word to use instead

Advertisements

17 responses to “Being “Discriminating” when it comes to #Immigration would be a GOOD thing….

  1. livinrightinpgh

    Wow! You got me going on two fronts: the Boston Terrorist Attack, and the Gang of Eight Immigration Reform Bill. Nice!

    I’m amazed that the Obama Administration has done everything in its power to eliminate “Jihad”, “Terrorist” or “Muslim Extremist” from the vernacular. Just look at the Fort Hood incident…..what did Obama call it? Oh yeah….”Workplace violence”.

    Still, there is NO problem with singling out “Christians”. In THAT case, discrimination is not only ok, but encouraged. Consider the story of the police training session where officers were advised to “be wary” of anyone who is “Christian, and believes in a literal interpretation of the Bible”.

    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/09/colo-sheriff-describes-shock-training-to-theblaze-dhs-bound-official-warned-against-christians-who-take-the-bible-literally/

    • Oh, I heard.
      Plus, don’t forget about the White Paper from a West Point think tank that warned of “far right” groups such as the “anti-federalist” movement, which supports “civil activism, individual freedoms and self-government.”
      http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/17/west-point-center-cites-dangers-far-right-us/

      It’s crazy and self-defeating, and must be confronted, daily. If enough folks stand up and say “Enough!!”, they’ll listen.

      But if it’s just a small minority, we’ll be ignored…

      • You know, bro, you and I have had this conversation ad nauseum. The Left, ably assisted by their willing accomplices in the media have made an artform out of controlling the definition of terms and by extension, the dialogue. Fortunately, they have a sorely undereducated audience that falls, far to easily, as prey to that bunk.

        One heart, one mind, one at a time…..it’s labor intensive, but definitely worth it.

  2. Read an article yesterday that asked if the Obama admin was going to call the Boston Marathon bombing, ‘road rage’.

    Nondiscrimination is also the goal of libs in that book I’ve been reading: The Kindergarten of Eden: How the Modern LIberal Thinks. Finally at 2/3 finished. I just don’t get much time to read. But this is exactly what that book is saying. Libs do not believe in any kind of discrimination. Not on the basis of race, for sure, but also on morals, success or failure, good or bad. None of those exist. After reading this over 6 months and trying to understand the ideology, it’s so foreign and alien that it’s hard to absorb.
    Exactly what your’re saying here, JTR.

    Great post.

    • “Road rage”!
      That’s pretty funny. Dark, … but funny.

      The language is important, much as Orwell wrote about in ‘1984’. If we have to spend all our time trying to figure out a way to express ourselves without potentially offending someone, somehow, we really won’t HAVE freedom of expression.

      Instead, we’ll have freedom of “approved” expression… which isn’t freedom at all.

    • Great one…. and why not? That’s about his speed.

    • –“Nondiscrimination is also the goal of libs in that book I’ve been reading: The Kindergarten of Eden: How the Modern LIberal Thinks”

      You know, the ivy towers who say they have a lock on ed-U-K-shun and claim to teach ‘critical thinking’, don’t what the rest of us to use any.

  3. Reblogged this on Tin Foil Hat Book Club.

  4. Reblogged this on aurorawatcherak and commented:
    Discernment is a decent synonym, but discriminate works best.

  5. JTR:
    You go! I never would have thought I’d see Gilligan brought into Illegal immitation, but there it is. 🙂

    Right you are, so there is another word for them discretion. And we are supposed to use it not lose it — along with our God-given senses and rights..

    • Ahhh, Gilligan’s Island: one of my very favorite shows as a young lad.
      And there wasn’t one boy in school who didn’t have an opinion on the great “Ginger or Mary Ann” debate…
      😉

      As for the post: yep, basic common sense is largely gone.

      We’re swimming against the tide, in an ocean of Political Correctness. If we don’t start pointing out the ridiculousness of it all, we’ll have only ourselves to blame when all of our freedoms are merely fond memories…

  6. Pingback: “Smart Power”: we supported the Boston Bombers via Welfare… | Two Heads are Better Than One

  7. Pingback: The IRS: “Above The Law” | Two Heads are Better Than One

  8. Pingback: Just in case you forgot: “If you oppose #Obamacare, you’re a big, fat, smelly Racist…” | Two Heads are Better Than One

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s