**NOTICE: this story has been updated for the final time, HERE…**
This story has gotten quite a bit of national attention in the past few days, thanks to the internet. This blog has certainly had an uptick in traffic because of JTR’s own blog post on the subject last week.
I was curious this morning, and since we’re enjoying yet another Spring snowstorm here in the Midwest, I had nothing better to do than hunt for new information on the incident.
This is what I found: the Daily Caller and Mediaite both carried stories this weekend with a revised statement from Florida Atlantic University(FAU). Apparently the exercise in question was not actually in the textbook, as previously reported, but was a suggestion in the teacher’s manual. Here’s the text of the exercise (emphasis mine), as reported in those blogs:
“This exercise is a bit sensitive, but really drives home the point that even though symbols are arbitrary, they take on very strong and emotional meanings. Have the students write the name JESUS in big letters on a piece of paper. Ask the students to stand up and put the paper on the floor in front of them with the name facing up. Ask the students to think about it for a moment. After a brief period of silence, instruct them to step on the paper. Most will hesitate. Ask why they can’t step on the paper. Discuss the importance of symbols in culture.”
OK, so now we have a clearer picture of the issue: it was supposed to be an exercise in being sensitive to symbols (cultural and religious). If I’m understanding the exercise correctly, the teacher should have stopped the exercise as soon as (s)he saw hesitation in her students. The point of the exercise was to illustrate the potency of symbols, even those one may not personally value. I’ve seen a number of comments on this story from people who would not profess to be Christians, but still felt the exercise, as initially reported, was inappropriate.
And that’s what the exercise was supposed to illustrate.
In addition, both news sources reported that FAU (predictably) issued an apology:
“We sincerely apologize for any offense this has caused. Florida Atlantic University respects all religions and welcomes people of all faiths, backgrounds and beliefs…. Contrary to some media reports, no students were forced to take part in the exercise; the instructor told all of the students in the class that they could choose whether or not to participate….
While we do not comment on personnel matters, and while student privacy laws prevent us from commenting on any specific student at the University, we can confirm that no student has been expelled, suspended or disciplined by the University as a result of any activity that took place during this class…
This exercise will not be used again….”
But we still have a problem–several, actually. The student’s original statement and the teacher’s are obviously contradictory. Only one of them (if either) is true. That leaves me with questions:
- Did the teacher, Ms. Poole, really misuse the exercise by insisting that the students follow through? This would imply that she either misunderstood the whole point of it, or that she had another agenda altogether.
- Or did the student (Ryan Rotela, a devout Mormon) choose to make a mountain out of a molehill for some reason of his own? Allegedly he was told not to return to that class, and is reported as saying, “I truly see this as, you know, I’m being punished. And… I’m still waiting for an apology from somebody.” This obviously contradicts FAU’s statement above.
- Also, why was the name “Jesus” stipulated in the exercise? I’m presuming that it was because that Name is so potent in our culture. But why wouldn’t the exercise have asked each student to write down their preferred name for God?
- Lastly (and perhaps most tellingly), the school’s statement is in essence saying that they did nothing wrong, and that the initial media reporting of the incident was inaccurate. Yet they said “This exercise will not be used again….”?? WHY? Why not use the exercise again, if there was nothing wrong with it and people are trying to portray it as something it wasn’t?
When (if?) we ever DO find answers to these questions, we’ll be sure to let you know.
Stories of overt discrimination and indoctrination abound in today’s culture, and yet just as often the media doesn’t have all their facts straight. To that end, I appreciate that Mediaite reported in their original article that they’d sent an email to the textbook author, in order to verify that the exercise was actually in the book. They also promised to update their article, and they did.
Obviously, we here at Two Heads aren’t paid journalists: we’re an editorial blog, passing along newsworthy items that you might not have seen in the mainstream media. We’ll always strive to accurately represent anything on which we report or comment, and/or update accordingly.
Being answerable to a higher Source, we believe that ONLY
“…the Truth shall set you free.” (John 8:32)
FAU comments: “We sincerely apologize for any offense this has caused. Florida Atlantic University respects all religions and welcomes people of all faiths, backgrounds and beliefs…. Contrary to some media reports, no students were forced to take part in the exercise; the instructor told all of the students in the class that they could choose whether or not to participate….”
REALLY? Then someone PLEASE explain to me how “respecting all religions” and the exercise itself (regardless of the intentions stated) can exist in the same space? It shouldn’t take a reaction from a student to tell them what they SHOULD have known before even embarking on the exercise. But, SOMEHOW, not “forcing” students to take part in the exercise in some way mitigates the offensiveness of it?
It is only MY opinion, but it occurs to me that if that “teachers’ manual” had suggested writing “Islam”, “Mohammed”, etc, it would have NEVER made it to the classroom.
Yet, the Leftist Academia will certainly attempt to hide behind the transparent veil of “Whaaaaaaat? It was JUST an exxxxxcerrrcise on the power of syyyyyymbollllllllls?”
And yet I think that it’s quite possible that Academia is already so indoctrinated in its OWN worldview that being offensive never occurred to them in this instance. That’s troubling in itself…
“It shouldn’t take a reaction from a student to tell them what they SHOULD have known before even embarking on the exercise.”
And remember, PGH:
when you recall that (A) the school is insisting they did nothing inappropriate, and (B) to never, ever do this again (“swearsies…”), it gives me the distinct impression that they’re not being entirely truthful.
Call it a hunch.
I’d bet the farm on your “hunch”, brother.
But….THIS is the type of thing that really irks me. Whenever the Left has their own actions brought up against them (the VERY things that they try to castigate others for doing), they get that “deer in the headlights” look. It’s like there’s not even a scintilla of honesty, consistency, or logic.
This just in,…FAU issues statement that professor Deandre Poole was not the instructor during the “stomp Jesus” exercise. That instead the class was taught by teaching assistant Sinead O’Conner…More at 6!
We don’t know the answers to the your questions, and that’s an important point. Readers are left to make a judgment based on the impression that the articles they read make on them. Few will pick up on the irony, though. If the point of the exercise were to teach a lesson in sensitivity, then we really have to question the judgment of the Professor Poole and her supervisor who put the student in this situation where they provoked his religious sentiments toward anger. As usual, the student ends up holding the short end of the stick. Where’s the sensitivity?
Yet at the end of the accounts we are left to believe that the student was the one who needed to learn a lesson in sensitivity and that he was being unreasonable. It’s a crying shame the way they handled the situation and the way the news pretends to present the story “objectively.” Shame on all of them.
I’d sure like to hear from the student again!
Pingback: “Jesus Stomp” – Chapter 3: Is this FINALLY resolved? | Two Heads are Better Than One
Pingback: College kids told to “stomp on Jesus” in class… | Two Heads are Better Than One