Camel’s nose, meet tent:
The Daily Caller (Washington, DC): California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein staged a dramatic press conference Thursday on Capitol Hill with 10 weapons at her side and unveiled legislation instituting a government ban on more than 150 types of firearms, including rifles, pistols and shotguns.
Flanked by other anti-gun liberal lawmakers, including New York Sen. Chuck Schumer and Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, Feinstein announced the introduction of the “Assault Weapons Ban of 2013.”
The legislation being pushed by Feinstein — who has long history of calling for gun bans — would prohibit the sale, transfer, importation and manufacture of certain firearms.
During the press event at the Dirksen Senate Office Building, the Democrats described these firearms as “dangerous military-style assault weapons.” The bill would also ban high-capacity ammunition feeding devices that can hold more than 10 rounds.
Feinstein said the country’s “weak” gun laws allow massacres like the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting occur.
“Getting this bill signed into law will be an uphill battle, and I recognize that — but it’s a battle worth having,” Feinstein said in literature handed to reporters at the Thursday event.
—–
First of all (and for about the 8,000th time): if we are trying to reduce violent homicides, then specific types of guns are not the problem:
We’ve been over this and over this. We might as well be trying to give a ‘Yes/No‘ test to a Labrador:
“Bark once for ‘Yes’, twice for ‘No’, …okay, Rover?”
“Woof, woof, woof…!”
The Left is impervious to logic. They can’t even be bothered to learn the most basic aspects of the items they wish to ban. And yet they persist.
So in the interest of trying to educate the deliberately obtuse, I’ll include the video below. If someone would like to show it to Ms. Feinstein (and help her with the big words), I’d be eternally grateful:
And I’ll say it AGAIN: The Left disguises their true motives behind the “crisis” of Sandy Hook, et al. Their goal is the elimination of ALL types of firearms in the hands of ANY citizen. When you understand the true intent of the Second Amendment, there is really only ONE conclusion to draw from their vehement attack on it……
The Left is showing its true colors more and more these days.
My hope is that their ego gets the best of them. Goodness knows it’s happened before…
Pingback: (VIDEO) Newt Gingrich to Piers Morgan: “Isn’t your REAL view that you would ban pistols, if you could?” | Two Heads are Better Than One
First, let me thank you for posting the video. I found it very informative and educational (being as unconversant with weaponry as I am).
Having said that, anyone who watched the video and is still pressing for limiting access to semi-automatic rifles is, 1) Either unwilling to admit the facts (in which case they have no business enacting laws); 2) Too stupid to understand the facts (in which case they have no business enacting laws); 3) Deceitfully pursuing their own agenda in conflict with the facts (in which case they have no business enacting laws).
Thank YOU, juwanna! As I said on a previous post, I’m not really a “gun” guy. However, nobody needs to be in order to see how ludicrous the Left’s position on this is.
And your comment is 100% on the money.
There really ARE only 3 ways to view their argument, such as it is, and none of them logically rationalizes their viewpoint.
Pingback: Obama sharpens his Marxist message for 2013 State of the Union speech | Two Heads are Better Than One
Pingback: Gun Control, our Children and the State | Two Heads are Better Than One
Pingback: (*VIDEO*) The NRA’s Colin Noir calls out the President | Two Heads are Better Than One
Pingback: So…, where do Police stand on the 2nd Amendment Debate? | Two Heads are Better Than One
Pingback: Detroit Mom Protects Her Family from Home Invasion, w/ a little help from the 2nd Amendment | Two Heads are Better Than One
Pingback: She’s back: Senator Di-Fi wants to ban guns that merely LOOK like military weapons | Two Heads are Better Than One