We can’t eliminate Government Waste, because Waste is what Government DOES

If you ever wanted a perfect example of the waste that’s inherent in Government, this is it.

government-waste

From Milwaukee’s Journal Sentinel Online:

The Social Development Commission’s $6.3 million weatherization program is running $1 million under budget, which means the agency might have to return the money to the state and lose $125,000 in administrative costs, finance director Bill Koch said Thursday.

To try to keep from accumulating a surplus, Koch asked the commission’s human resources committee to consider an incentive program for the weatherization staff to try to increase production and get projects in the pipeline sooner so that more units can be completed by June when the grant year ends.

First of all, you have an agency that’s **gasp** running under budget. In the private sector, this would be what we call a “positive”. But not in Big Government world, no sir.

Nope, if the SDC (Social Development Commission) can’t figure out a way to spend all the grant money, rather than being congratulated or even getting a bonus for efficiency, they’d have to return $125,000 of their stipend/fee (aka – “administrative costs”).

Ummmm…what?

You read that right. They HAVE to spend the extra million dollars budgeted…and are considering paying employees bonuses to make sure it all goes out the door. Such reckless squandering reads like a twisted version of ‘Brewster’s Millions’, and just like that book’s protagonist, the only thing Government has ever learned about money is how to spend it.

BurningThroughMoney

It’s obvious that the SDC certainly took that lesson to heart years ago:

Koch said that in previous years there were incentives offered in the program. Workers who do the energy audits to prepare the projects to go to contractors would work at night and on weekends to try to reach more qualified homeowners for weatherization, said Human Resources Director Donna Kaczmarek.

If the number of completed units exceeded their goals, workers would be paid incentives, she said.

In my mind, I can almost hear the voices of the Agency administrators as they desperately exhort their employees: “Spend! It’s just tax dollars, so who cares? Spend it all; NOW! We can’t get any more money until we spend what we have, so spend it faster! Here, we’ll even give you a bonus if you just spend the entire wad of taxpayer cash!!!!!”

Hey, SDC — here’s a tip: if you’re havin’ a hard time finding homes that actually need to be weatherized (the article mentions only 50% of homes which are coaxed into applying actually qualify), maybe that means the community doesn’t need your darn program. Ever think of that? Maybe, …just maybe,….we could all conduct just ONE aspect of our lives without you guys buttin’ in and trying to help us…by spending more of our own dough.

—–

Remember the phrase (shamelessly stolen from Mark Steyn): the “inexorable ratchet of Government“? It basically means that Government always grows bigger, and since it doesn’t actually create the money it spends, it is inherently a poor steward of it.

Well, here is that exact lesson being acted out in front of us, in all of its gluttonous glory.

taxpayer

Normally I could end this post right here, but there’s an additional example that’s just as important. It comes at the very end of the article, as if an afterthought:

The committee also agreed to recommend to the full board that the SDC employee tuition reimbursement policy be revised to limit it to six credits or $5,000 per person for one year, whichever is less. The agency’s policy has permitted an employee to take up to 12 credits a year with tuition capped at $1,200 a credit.

“This is very lucrative,” said McHenry, adding that most businesses and other employers don’t provide reimbursements that high.

(….)

Sullivan questioned whether an anti-poverty agency should provide any tuition credits, saying agency dollars should be spent to help the poor.

His motion to eliminate tuition reimbursement failed.

By their own admission, such a ridiculously generous reimbursement level is out of step with the norm. Only by working at an ‘anti-poverty’ agency can you get paid $14,400/year to go to school. Is anyone surprised the motion to eliminate this failed immediately?

When you’re spending someone else’s money, it’s awfully easy to be generous.

gov worker

We’re broke. We’re $16 Trillion in the hole, and digging like crazy toward seventeen. And still our elected leaders are spending like Veruca Salt with her daddy’s American Express card.

Like the saying goes, “if you’re not outraged, you’re simply not paying attention…”

—–

It’s inevitable: the Fiscal Cliff is coming, yet in many ways we went over some time ago. And just like any fall, it’s the sudden stop at the end that’s gonna cause the real damage.

At least now you know who pushed us over the edge in the first place.

Advertisements

11 responses to “We can’t eliminate Government Waste, because Waste is what Government DOES

  1. You just HAVE to ask yourself how big of an idiot you’ve become when the thinking at the SDC (and EVERY other gov’t agency that does the same) makes sense to you. Worse, in most cases, the public voted these morons into office.

    Here in my beloved home town, we had a wonderful project called the “North Shore Connector”. It was HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS that HAD to be used to build an underwater tunnel so that the public commuter train could travel UNDER the Allegheny River for a grand total of several hundred yards. In a city with more bridges than any other American city, it made about as much sense as putting a gold door on an outhouse. BUT….the money could NOT be used on any other project, such as road expansion, bridge repair, etc. It was a “use it for THIS project” or lose it proposition.

    JTR…..I want to become more popular with your neighbors, so I’m going to take all of YOUR money and YOUR “stuff” and give it away. Ok with you?

    • Yeah, it’s everywhere. “Use it or lose it” – as if it was theirs to “lose” in the first place.
      I’m not sure what the answer is, but I do know one thing: MORE GOVERNMENT sure as heck AIN’T the answer!

  2. At least it’s something they’re proficient at. And it’s always easiest to waste Other Peoples Money.

    • Proficient they are, RP!!
      Such waste is immoral, and should punished by jail time.

      In the Private Sector they’d simply be fired. Of course, since this is gov’t, they’ll probably get RAISES…

  3. I should be used to ths sort of thing by now, but it still makes my blood boil

    • Mine as well, CTX.

      I think what galls me the most is the LOOK you get from some Gov’t folks (& ALL Progressives) when you point out examples like this, and they look at you quizzically and say, “But, what’s WRONG with it?”

  4. Pingback: How the Government *protects* our Tax money: “Spend it or Lose it!!!” | Two Heads are Better Than One

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s